To start, give a listen to some or all of this podcast....its interesting. Then continue to my discussion...
(~37min)
So the podcast starts by talking about the cost of child
abuse in the United States and it costs more than they spend on education. This
is interesting…I think the focus should be on how little is spent on education,
but that is a story for another blog. Let us talk about this Barbara Harris. The biological mother of 6 with 4 adopted black
children of addicted mothers with her organization (CRACK) that intends to
prevent child abuse…..or so she claims.
The claim is that you can end a cycle of neglect and abuse by
preventing addicts from having children (she also wants to set up in Kenya to control
people with AIDS so that a child does not have to live in that lifestyle). So
she is bribing addicted women with drug money to give up their fertility. She
buys their reproductive choice with $300 for getting sterilized and $200 for
birth control. Plus there is a $50 referral fee if your friend goes along (I guess drug addicts prefer to travel to the the sterilization clinic in pair).
No rehab, no counselling….just a desperate woman being paid to do something to her body that she would not have done sober. Who knew saving children was all about buying off other people’s reproduction?!
BTW, Medicaid pays for the actual procedure....
Even if you have become clean you were a drug addict so you
should prevent yourself from getting pregnant anyway. Harris does not believe that
reproduction is a right.
 |
Harris' bus,Source:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/8071664/Drug-addict-sterilised-for-cash-but-can-Barbara-Harris-save-our-babies.html
|
Let's be honest, this mission is not about ending child abuse- it’s too
simplistic of a response. It really is more about controlling the reproductive
choices of women that Harris has determined are inferior to her. Face it,
when women that are homeless and drug addicted get pregnant there are very few
options for them. Heck, getting pregnant was most likely the result of their lack of life options. As well, more often than not, they are not allowed to keep
their children and the babies are removed from their custody at birth.
The other part of this is-- what about the healing time? Are they just sent back
home to their unsuitable lifestyle? What about infections? So many questions.
With the money that this group is putting
into “eradicating child abuse” they could support a rehab and parenting centre
so that these women can get a second a chance. Provide positive support rather than enable their habit.
But we all know this is not about eradicating child abuse.
Child abusers do not always live on the street; they don’t always take drugs. When you expand your thinking you realize not all people that do drugs are child abusers. Some are
great with children. Some have other supports and this helps them.
I think what outrages me more than everything else is that
this is a process that is specifically designed to oppress women.
Men don’t have the option of being sterilized. What about
the johns that take advantage of drug addicted women; the ones who give her $10
for bareback and don't pull out.?
What about those jerks that got her pregnant in the first
place.
These assholes aren’t even being arrested. Now the women
have another person using them for her own selfish superego. A woman
nonetheless!
Now let us get back the whole idea of ending child abuse.
How about we target the source of the abuse or the addiction? Or is that too complex and not
enough of a television bite? I guess it would make people realize that there
are several different environments that are not the ideal for raising a child. Or
maybe Barbara just likes being in control of “crack whores”…does that make her
a pimp?
Further information:
Is it legal to sterilize addicts: http://people.howstuffworks.com/is-it-legal-to-sterilize-addicts.htm
CRACK Uses Unethical Tactics to Stop Women with Substance
Abuse Problems: http://www.cwpe.org/node/56